SARFARAZ AHMED versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE, LAHORE
Schedule 3, Terms No 9 and 11 [hereinafter Amended by the Punjab Amendment Ordinance (III of 1981]] Pricing, Land Under Scheme, Paragraphs for Allotment of Land under MLR 9 (1961) 6 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Application Border Area Land Transfer Inheritance Transfer, Requirement of any Objection Certificate Conflict Transfer of Land in Border Area by Military Allotment and This is related to the need for an objection certificate from the General Headquarters (GHQ) which exchanged all transfers to the Army ending in the year 1997. The shopkeepers had or have had legal heritage of the Yeti Allies, as per their order, canceled all transfers recorded from the Alliances on 23 12 2009. No objection from the GHQ by the Border Area Committee The approved allotment validation order was invalid because of a change in the legacy recorded transfer from the process of law, which should be subject to limited scrutiny and no objection, in the case of subsequent transactions, with GHQ practicing permanently. The temperament must require that their expiry be made in advance of each year in 1997 due to any previous issues Objection certificates should be approved, which resulted in the public deciding that all who were interested in the property transferred by the military allies or their successors should thus be cleared of all confusion. The Border Area Committee, the GHQ, and the Revenue Authority's policy regarding grievances and suspicions regarding the conduct of such laws must be at its discretion in determining the rights of those affected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
