Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HIMAYUN KHAN SHAHEED versus SARFRAZ AKHTAR


Section 154 In its present form, the FIR's registration of the appellant's complaint could not be withheld from any constitutional provision of the law, nor could it require the registration of a criminal case, as it was directed by the Supreme Court. Was to obey civil law. His personal complaint is that the applicant's eyesight was weakened due to the vaccination in question, as it did not find any evidence from the appellant that his request could be trusted or that the trusted appellant could only rely on it. Used to depend on Instead of pointing to some documentary evidence, oral statements, which can show some nexus between the claims made in relation to his vision and the use of vaccination in questions, provide the discrimination ruling with sound reasoning and convincing arguments. Was approved and no interference was sought. Accordingly, the appeal in Lemien was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Besham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.