Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ALIAS BILLA versus STATE

In complying with the evidence, Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed did not nominate the accused in the FIR nor did the complainant and the prosecution witnesses in the private complaint say that the accused was investigating the crime. Officer and was not connected to the court commission. The witnesses, who were closely related to the named accused, came forward to rescue them, and for the purpose, they made false statements against the accused. The recovery of the rifle on the accused's offer was highly suspicious and according to the report. During the same time the forensic science laboratory was not used, the evidence of the court witnesses was not credible and was not reliable accusation The trial court failed to interpret the evidence on the basis of such deficiency evidence properly. The accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• SHAMAS ALI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SAMBRIAL 2012 PLD 183
• HIMAYUN KHAN SHAHEED v. SARFRAZ AKHTAR 2012 PCrLJ 187
• MUHAMMAD ADREES v. NAZAR HUSSAIN, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE/EX-OFFICO JUSTICE OF PEACE 2012 PLD 188
• AMAN ULLAH v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2012 PLD 194
• SARFARAZ AHMED v. BORDER AREA COMMITTEE, LAHORE 2012 PLD 198
• Mian MUHAMMAD MUZAFFAR v. MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/ CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB 2012 YLR 202
• Rana JAHANGIR KHAN v. MANZOOR AHMAD 2012 PLD 204
• SAEED ANWAR HAYAT v. M. ISRAR BHATTI 2012 PCrLJ 206

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes