Section 302/109/148/149 Qatl E AMD defective and dishonest investigation of the state's case by the police rejected the message complaint, which was impugned under the trial court by the trial court in error of law Was required to file a state case record and reject a private complaint that relied on police action, which was contested by the complainant who was fair and honest. The trial court could not remove the complainant's concurrent evidence, but it was the trial court's duty that the same Eels Court was reviewing patron beyond temporary impairment by comparing the private complaint with the police, the complainant did not accept as honest feedback about the commission of any offense. The accused was compelled by the trial court to confine the evidence to the complainant and to the evidence contained in the evidence. During the investigation under Section 202, the person was charged before the Judicial Magistrate in a private complaint; the CRPC private complaint could not be directly dismissed on the charge of non-submission of articles, when the complainant. The defendant's post-mortem report and statements were supported along with the statement. Of the three other witnesses who have been delayed in filing a private complaint, it cannot be fatal. A request for change in the investigation was also heard while the competent forum trial court, on the one hand, dismissed the private complaint while it was processing the state's case. Which still has to be presented on the supplementary invoice after inquiry
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
