ALAMDAR ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Section RO 989 (I) / 1997 Dated 15 10 1997 Section RO (I) / 1998 Directive 1 7 1998 Constitutional Application Notification of the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) and decision and decision on the notification of the Column Customs Virus. The order was challenged by. (Lahore) Maintaining Constitutional Competence before the High Court Regional Jurisdiction (Sindh) The High Court scope importer (applicant) obtained exemption from imposing customs duty under section RO 9999 (I) / 1997 and on machinery and equipment. The customs collector (defendant) of the imported sales tax customs cleared the imported goods, but was unaware that section RO 989 (I) / 1997 (first section RO) with immediate effect Was acquitted by RO (I) / 1998. 1 7 1998 (Second Section RO) Consequently, the Collector of Customs sent the Demand Notice to the Importer due to the duty and tax payable because the exemption exemption was rejected, after the notice of demand was merged ( In fact, before the order was challenged in the present constitutional petition (Lahore), the Central Collector of Customs and the Central Board of Revenue (respondents) raised the claim that the present constitutional petition had already passed the deciding order. Not able to challenge (Lahore) High Court for lack of territorial jurisdiction Collector Customs was a legal officer who was performing duties in Karachi which was beyond the jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court importer. The present constitutional petition is maintained on the basis that the Collector of Customs works all over Pakistan. What is and he is capable of jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court. , And that's where one of the Central Board of Revenue's
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
