The lawsuit was filed for the plaintiff's declaration under section title42, therefore challenging the change of suit land in favor of the defendant (the brother of the plaintiff), saying that the fraud was obtained through fraud and fraud. Was done and that the plaintiff would be entitled to inherit it. After the death of the second defendant (the plaintiff's mother) the suit land was decided by the trial court and the appellate court rejected the trial court's order. On the basis that the plaintiff has no concrete position to sue. The other defendants mentioned above did not accept the change and did not file a lawsuit challenging it, though they were alive only said about the other defendants' expected heirs and they have not yet transferred the property. Was made, the plaintiff was not interested, or during the life of the title dealer / transfer on the existing suit property, the probable heir had no locus standi to challenge the estate from the probable heir. And he could not sue for the declaration under it, so the defendant was still alive and The trial court appeared and recorded its statement and filed a written statement without further friend. Therefore, only the second defendant could file for a declaration challenging the change of land suit ision r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
