Sections 4 384 and 3 383 were granted by the trial court to the applicant to amend his written response in connection with the applicant's bank account for the revision of the successor certificate; the trial court's order was suspended by the applicant. It was held that the injunction cannot be revised under the Applicable Legislative Act, 1925, even if implemented by a civil court, it is always considered action by the District Judge, Which is validated under Section 384 (1) of the Succession Act. , 1925 in the event of granting, denying or revocation of the certificate. Whereas, because of section 383 (3), the High Court was empowered to review by order of the District Judge in cases other than those mentioned in section 384 (1), Succession Act, 1925, the amendment was authorized.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
