RANA MUHAMMAD IKRAM versus MEHRAN FERTILIZERS (REGD.), FAISALABAD THROUGH MS. RASHIDA TALLAT
Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A-XXXVII, Rr. 1, 2 and 4 Recovery Tool Promise Note Agreement Suite By Claimant Under A-XXXVII, Rule 1, CPC 15,00, 000 was rejected to recover the plaintiff and in favor of the trial the court refused to reject the decision rendered by the defendant that the plaintiff relied on the agreement, which was not a breach of promise. The agreement included an unconditional action and assurance that it amounted to Rs.1,00,000, payable by the defendant and paid to the plaintiff on two specific dates. The contents of the document were fully covered by the appreciation of the Primarie Note as stated in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the trial court rightfully took serious action and the whole proceeding was subject to the relevant law trial. Was done The court rightly upheld the previous partial decision and order against the defendant and dismissal application under O XXXVII, R 4, CPC, for valid and valid reasons. The use of the amended jurisdiction refused to interfere with the decision and the trial court's decree passed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
