Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337 F (v) Qutel-e-Amal, Attempt to Convict Kotal Amd, Suspension of Death Penalty During the Appeal of the Non-Jifa Hashima Appeal After engaging in a conviction with a co-accused, the infecting accused was sentenced under Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337 f (v), PPC, and the accused's trial court inmate killed him. It was punished that it had no active role in it. The incident and the main culprits were portrayed as an abuser and that the trial court confused the accused with a co-accused, who was assigned a special role in the main incident which justified the suspect from the very beginning. Despite the fact that the defendant was convicted of causing the death of the victim and injuring a witness during the witness statements, the provocative and assigned the same character was assigned to him. That he was never charged with death or death. Injury to the said injury where merely reading the evidence at a glance concludes that the evidence available on the record is not sufficient to sustain the offense or it is illegally floating, then Section 264 Cr, Cr. Using the power under the PC. The death sentence against an offender could be suspended during the appeal sentence.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
