Article 42 One of the defendants and the defendants who were members of the Cooperative Society for the declaration of the father of the defendants were allotted land in dispute in 1948, and Alotti died in 1961 and it is said that the defendant was his One of his sons, his designated land was the deceased allottee, who was in joint ownership of the plaintiff and the plaintiff (son), who was allotted to designate the deceased; The lawsuit, which was periodically dismissed by the trial court and appellate court, was later dismissed. The person designating the late allottee had no right to the allotment of the entire allotment of the late allottee, but all his legal heirs were entitled to the same plaintiff, in which case, the allotment order made in favor of the defendant / nominee was challenged. The technical basis is that the order of allotment was not made, the claim of the plaintiffs cannot be dismissed. There is no doubt that there will be no limit against the legal heritage or against the invalid order, But once the plaintiff has found out the fraud, then these limits will begin to be filed by the plaintiffs. The 16-year delay, which was time-barred, was deemed right by the courts due to the limitation, after which the plaintiff / nominee appeared to be a good buyer of the suit property, rightly so. But it was held like this
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
