MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Sections 17, 25 (8) (G), 26 (3) (B) and 50 National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1974, Regulation 32 Employers' interim stay petition against unfair labor practice Order, application Four applicants / individual workers and two non-collector bargaining agent unions in their applications to declare the respondents / management permanent employees and manage the banned contract under section 17 (e) (f) management and collective Prayed for the signing of the bargaining agent. ), 26 (3) (b) and 50 of the 50 Industrial Relations (Restoration and Amendment) Act, 2010, it was the only collective bargaining agent who could register proceedings and execute to guarantee any right. And under any law, settlement or award reserved to the collector, bargaining agents could not support the cause of individual workers and they had no locus standi to challenge the agreement / settlement, which was Implemented and implemented and the benefits were also raised by the applicants, in such cases, the National Industrial Relations Commission, in this agreement Daklt was already in the process could not, even if it is considered an unfair labor practice, and it could not stop the action. The applicant failed to state which components of the unfair exercise were attracted and the only punitive and unambiguous allegations were given without precedent and examples of unfair labor before the applicants filed a constitutional petition. The same point and the High Court dismissed the petition because of the advice of the parties
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2012
