GHULAM QASIM KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECONDARY (SCHOOL AND LITERACY) EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PESHA
Applicants of the R10 Arbitration of Arbitration (v. 2003), Sections 3, 5 and 6 of Pakistan, Article 204 contempt of court (applicant) pray for his appointment against this post on the basis of quota allocated for the Ex-Army. While filing a constitutional petition. On the request of the applicant, the constitution was treated as a representative of the High Court which should be decided in accordance with the law, rules and government policy. Applicants were of the view that he had the right to be appointed against the said post. According to the notification of the provincial government department 10% quota, and since the department was not in compliance with the order of the High Court, it was a matter of contempt of court department that the Constitution petition was considered as representing the High Court. Was. To be judged according to competence and law. No such directive was given to the department for the appointment of the applicant. There was no quota of ex-military personnel in place of the applicant's position, and that, after presenting the constitutional petition as a representation, the applicant wrote a letter asking the applicant to follow the procedure outlined in the advertisement. , But he failed to do so in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government Employees (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1989, and the applicant's complaint was rejected under the rules, Under which, if an applicant is available to the applicant as per the notification of the provincial government, then there was a quota. ? Worked with the Department in accordance with law, regulations and government policy, and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
