Section 9 praises drug possession and smuggling evidence - All prosecutor's testimony remains in effect in relation to the impact of recovery and recovery of defective trucks. Witnesses said that although he was inspected for a long time, the defense failed to damage or terminate his testimony, claiming the defendant was unaware of the presence of a car prohibition such as The truck was recovered from the secret caves, could not be accepted because the suspects failed to justify it. Presence in the vehicle; and the driver of the vehicle was generally aware of the luggage or the cargo in the truck, unless otherwise established. At the time of the incident, one of the truck driver tried to escape by accelerating the vehicle. There was nothing available to capture the play or the other two suspects sitting with the driver, unaware of the ban in the car were all suspects cousins, it is alleged that the suspects had only called for an elevator and also had been riding in the truck. Will not Both appellants failed to justify their presence in the vehicle, which would only be enough to convince them that they had a conscious knowledge of drug presence in the truck's secret caves. There was nothing on the record that the prosecution's testimony against them was accumulated. The accused had any wrong intentions or wrong motives that could lead them to false accusations. It is suspected that in the case of the crime of the accused, in the trial, in the cases, the accused was given appropriate punishment or punishment.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
