O XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 66 (d) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 33, 37 and 38. The proposed water supply scheme for supplying the injunction against any government department (the defendants). The dispute was filed in place of a permanent injunction and a permanent injunction for the claim that the government department and a politician were approved by the plaintiff for the residents of the village, to move the water supply scheme and the plaintiff's welfare. Are not eligible to install the same in another village. (Applicant) The application for a temporary injunction by the plaintiff against the implementation of the aforesaid water supply was accepted by the trial court and the temporary injunction was granted, and its appeal was dismissed before the appeal court dismissed. The water supply scheme for the new village, which was to be implemented by the government department, is also the implementing agency site. After preparing the feasibility report, the scheme was selected by the aforementioned department in the village of the plaintiff. Two tube wells already existed, which could be enough for the village population, and for that reason a third tube well was being built. It is proposed to install in the new village, which had a lot of dispersed population around the proposed site, the two tube wells installed in the village of the plaintiff were not short of their requirements, the proposed scheme was not the exclusive personal property of the plaintiff, People in his village and other nearby villages will benefit from it. The politician who proposed the plan was an elected representative of the area, who knew better than anyone else where to implement the scheme, as he would be re-elected.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
