Section 497 (5) Conduct of Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 F (vi) / 34 Qatal Amad, Ghat Jaffa Manqila, Attempt to murder QMD, joint intention to cancel bail order and guarantee The cancellation of the case had to be dealt with in various courtyards. In the present case, the bail has been in place for the last fifteen (15) months and since then there has not been a single document which shows that the accused has been denied bail privileges. Used, nor is there anything in the record that shows that there are some new facts and circumstances that could have led to the suspect being trapped, while one of the accomplices was out on bail. S section 265, the court had acquitted him down under the RPC, the suspect was the same. The accused was charged because the accused was absconding but the absconder could not be convicted. The complainant had requested that he not be given any notice for the hearing to approve the bail proceedings, but to approve the bail. As a result, the notice was issued to the complainant and he was absent, the accused did not need prosecution for further investigation, the challan was complete and he was granted bail by a competent court of law. Was granted, there was no reason to return orders to approve the bail, so, requesting a bail cancellation, Registered
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
