Find a Lawyer

SANA ULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997) Section 9 Drug trafficking and trafficking of narcotics, knowledge of the prohibited presence in the vehicle was present in the vehicle along with its accompanying suspect, where a large quantity of the prohibited substance Has been recovered. It is not proven whether the accused knew of the prohibited presence in the vehicle nor did he have any record that he was the owner, conductor or driver of the vehicle in questionnaire record or even silent about the prohibited export of personal property. Was. In fact, the accused was hiding in secret car wounds. In this case, the investigation was complete and no further investigation was needed.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• MANZOOR AHMED v. State 2012 YLR 1097
• ABDUL RAHIM v. State 2012 YLR 1106
• RASHEED KHAN v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 2012 CLC 1113
• GHULAM QASIM KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secondary (School and Literacy) Education Department, Pesha 2012 PLC(CS) 1113
• SARTAJ v. THE STATE through Deputy Attorney General, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar 2012 PTD 1116
• AHMAD ALI JAN v. IRFAN 2012 PCrLJ 1119
• ISMAIL KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 1124
• NASIR ALI v. SAMI ULLAH 2012 PCrLJ 1127

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

famous supreme court advocate from Orakzai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes