Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed appreciating the evidence The complainant was not an eyewitness to the incident and his information regarding the accused's presence and involvement in the crime was based on the disclosure of a widow with whom the accused was in a friendly relationship. And he was not presented at trial and his presence was not shown at the hospital when the complainant made the report. Apart from making the report, the complainant was not involved in the investigation and the police assisted the star. Had practiced the whole The witness whose example was devised says that the site was planned on the presentation of the Star witness, contradicting his story mode and his incident on the victim by the suspect. The story of the shooting contradicts the medical evidence, saying the testimony of the site's plan to not cooperate with the situation, even though the recovery of blood and the absence of opportunity, doubts on the version of the prosecution. The witness, which could not be resolved in favor of the prosecution, did not prove the presence of the witness at the relevant time, medical evidence was denied. Was set aside and acquitted of the charge and released in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
