Sections 6A6A, 3?3, 50 Superd and 1 561A, order for a superintendent vehicle, pending application for a vehicle has been with the local police since 10 10 10 10, 2010 2010 and theft or robbery of the aforementioned vehicle There were no reports about. The police applicant has neither the property of the matter nor the need for further investigation, the only claimant of the vehicle who, in the absence of a competing claimant along with his open exchange letter, the vehicle's last owner / The transfer was affidavit, with the fact that the vehicle was not stolen nor involved in any criminal case, the applicant could not be denied his superannuation simply because the chassis number was refitted. And was welded to a laboratory report per vehicle which was neither stolen nor stolen. The involvement of any criminal case could not have been kept by the police without further progress in investigating the case for an indefinite period. Dee, the police could not justify the deterioration and deterioration of the parking lot in the courts that the impugned orders of both the courts were denied and the applicants were given a car on the superdee. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
