Section (42 ()) Conventions (10 of 1984 1984), Article 100 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 8, 42, 54 of the suit declaration, possession and perpetuation of a permanent injunction discrimination The plaintiff's case was a suit. The trial court ruled, but the appellate court set aside the trial court's order in which the suit land was transferred in the name of the defendant in the interest of the accused, and the effect was confirmed in 1954. That was before the implementation of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, and therefore no mechanism was in place to achieve the changeable signature / thumb impression of the signatures / thumb impressions. After the issuance of the notification in 1980, the shopkeeper was compulsory on the above name, the admission of the legal heir of the plaintiff's sister regarding the fact of the mutation was appreciated by the courts in the interest of the defendant. Users and variables were permanently added to the owners' register, and the truth was linked to long-term entries. The change was confirmed in 1954 while the suit was brought in 1996. 42 After a gap of 42 years it was stated that the variable is more than thirty years old, therefore, under Article 100 of the Constitution of the Constitution, the notion of right had to be linked to the above variable. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
