MIANGUL BADSHAH versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SWAT
Determination of the amount of land compensation received by Section 23 Land Acquisition Landlords, whose property was acquired, after the issuance and publication of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the basis for negotiation between them. But their property was paid for. The parties and their compensation rate was fixed at Rs 22,000 per kinnel in 1990, after which the acquisition process was completed, the notification started in 1988 and after 12 years of deep sleep the land was acquired. The market value of has been fixed. In the year 2000, at the same rate that was paid to landlords in the year 1990, which was the only market standard for determining the current market value, compensation in the year before the publication of the notification under section 4, and also when the acquisition process landed. Was in accordance with the provisions of the Acquisition Act, 1894, so that when the acquisition was delayed, the present market value, twelve years before the time of the publication of the notification, could not be held in any way. The market value referee court also indicated that it lacked the application of the court's mind and considered the provisions of section 23 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and delayed the acquisition process, of the acquired land. Possible value is completely ignored. And under his future prospects decision and referee court order, the property was ordered to be set at a rate of Rs. 80,000 per kanal, with a simple interest of 6% from the date of occupation. Along with 15% mandatory acquisition compensation
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
