Section 5 and Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Case and Dowry Articles Case for Recovery of Cabinet, in which the Claimant authorizes the payment of submersible money, the statement of the author of this Cabinet and The other witness was fully present in the evidence. It was proved that the indoor amount of Rs 30,000 was due to cross-examination by the defendant, but no record was brought in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff also denied the dowry because the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the Rs 90,000 but the trial court passed a decree for Rs 30,000 as a price for the articles of the dowry, because the marriage of the parties was practiced six years ago. ? And the above articles were in the use of spouse The counsel for the defendant could not identify any illegal or irregularities, High court interference in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction over trial judgment and numerous legal jurisdiction in the order. Demanded.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012