Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 324, 148 and 149 attempted to compel the murder prayer, a felony with a deadly weapon, he, along with his co-accused, fired at it simultaneously. Hurt his right leg, and the motive for the crime was a back-and-forth dispute between the parties, with Valdetti complaining that five people were charged for maintaining the same injury on an unnecessary part of his body. The five accused in the IR were charged with effective firing, but no special role was assigned to anyone. No vacancies were recovered from the spot and the complainant was reportedly at the mercy of the accused, but there was no evidence of this. The repetition of the fire shots, which led to doubts about the complainant's intention to assassinate Ahmed, was also unsatisfactory in the fact that the complainant's medical report did not conform to the prosecution's version. Further investigations into his crime were called. The accused's request was granted bail and he was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
