MANZOOR ELLAHI QURESHI versus MUHAMMAD BILAL ABBAS
Article 181 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Article 48 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Second Request for Implementation of Constitutional Request Rules Fresh request which is mentioned in section 48, CPC Convention Plaintiff (Defendant) Filed a lawsuit for recovery of the money in the previous judgment, but after a period of four years, six months and twenty-four days, the application for execution of the order was filed. The petitioner was dismissed by the plaintiff filed another petition for execution of the said decree against which the defendant (applicant) filed The petition, which was rejected, was also barred by the plea agreement, but both courts dismissed the defendant's request in which the application for the execution of the civil court's order was limited to the Act of 1908. Was enacted under Article 181, which had a term of three years. Any subsequent fresh or fresh request for execution is subject to a six-year limitation period, as defined by section es, when the meaning of the request for the implementation of the latest CPC expression was considered. After the first execution petition was dismissed, the plaintiff filed an application for ex parte decree after a long and unclear period of four years, more than six months. Twenty-four days, which the application was withheld over time and the two lower courts wrongly extended the statute of limitations in favor of the plaintiff, did not prevent the plaintiff from filing an application for execution by any legal restriction. Gone, even when the defendant failed to set aside
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
