Attempt to commit Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Qtil AMD, Qatel AMD bail, further inquiry into the FIR was the applicant / accused complainant, during the incident, There was also an injury that was confirmed by medical evidence, the record did not say that the applicant / complainant was included in the row as the accused because there was no ocular evidence and no Had also not been acquitted against the complainant. At the time of the incident, no one had noticed that the applicant was accused as accused 6/7 days after the incident and it is long enough that the applicant's case is considered as bail and bail. Was released on the matter of The applicant did not differ from his co-partner so permanently, under the permanent rule, the applicant supported the applicant's case even though it remained for some time, but it would have been unnatural in that case. The case was submitted for bail on good counts, only the absconder would not withdraw from the bail, if the defamatory material was not available against him, the case was of two versions, one was that the accused was referred to the accused The firearm was targeted, while the complainant filed a report in the company of the complainant and in the above incident. A. The second version was produced after 6/7 days that the incident was done by the applicant, both versions had to be tested during the trial and then one had to be accepted. The matter was further investigated
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
