NASEEM AHMED ANSARI versus HOUSING AND WORKS DEPARTMENT
A. XXVII, the R1 Contract Act (IX of 1872), a section 2 suit against the Department and its officials, which allegedly was changed during the construction work to recover the money for collection. The oral direction / order of such officers shall not be in accordance with the verbal direction or promise made by the Department Government unless in writing this Agreement with the approval of a competent authority after the modification of the original contract. There is no verbal restriction after editing. Instructions to increase construction under the control of public officers would be acceptable, but the work done in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the contract shall not be legally binding on the plaintiff on the basis of such oral direction / order record. Pay In the case of inheritance, the plaintiff had suits for additional construction work as required by law. The instruction was approved without the approval of the competent authority of such personnel; the plaintiff may claim the appropriate amount from them in their private capacity. Not because the suit was dismissed in his official capacity \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
