Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Qatl EM bail, refusing to complain of not being an eyewitness, did not name the accused, but later when he found out that he had been charged in this case. The conditions were unusual. In his statement, the offender, who had committed a confession before the competent forum, had clearly confessed to his crime and said that the manner and manner of the crime was revealed even though he was later withdrawn, But such a retrial would be thrown out at trial and not a bail-out confessional statement. In the circumstances, the accused was linked to the crime. Police recovered a scarf from the bathroom of the house, which was used as a weapon of crime. As used, the accused also recovered the identification, the accused had two children also recorded their statements under Section 161, CR PC He dismissed that the accused (his mother) had committed the murder of his father, although these records were with some delay in AID, but this was not enough to reduce his cost at this stage. No other motive was established, there was not enough evidence against the accused in the form of his confession, the evidence of his own children and the recovery of weapons of crime. The person who linked him to the crime, has been charged, in these circumstances was not entitled to bail waiver
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
