Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed, while appreciating the evidence, did not appeal to the accused, but instead demanded an alteration of the sentence from death to life imprisonment, as there were several mitigating circumstances available. Guaranteed, three co-accused were left empty-handed, while the suspect was armed with a 30-bore licensed pistol that showed the defendant's conduct on the spot, with intent to prepare, murder and advance planning. Didn't come up with the ban. After the victim denied the demand for money, the accused became enraged and opened fire on the victim, which was suddenly provocative. All the injuries were on the knee and thigh of the deceased, which was an important part of the deceased's body. Injuries to the unimportant part of the victim's body proved that the accused had no intention of murder, the defendant's intention was to lower the case to lesser punishment while serving the death sentence or life imprisonment, the trial court said. Was required to record the reasons The court request was applied by the complainant in the FIR, which did not confirm that the evidence that came up was that there was a repeat dispute between the victim and the accused, but in the evidence The nature of the recurrence was not disclosed. The relaxation and circumstance of nature required gentle reflection The death sentence was changed to life imprisonment Appeal dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
