Section 2 (b) Qatil Ahmed, in his examination praising the evidence of the Chief of Complaints, endorsed the version given in his report and granted some restrictions in his interim examination, but when he was declared admissible He confessed the relationship between the two. He and the accused complainant also confessed to the presence of the accused at the scene of the incident. Prosecution witnesses supported the prosecutor's version. Recovery of blood-stained earth, shot. The gun recovered a stained shirt in his room and the victim's blood from the stained shirt was cleared of the breast the next day after the incident. About 2/1 of the accused confessed for the first time after the confession turned out to be a crime 2 years No hard and fast rule can be formulated that how much time should be given to the accused before recording the confessional statement, Because it depends on the circumstances of the case, the absence of the circumstances or the weakness of the purpose or the failure to prove the same, the situation will not be taken as mitigating. The confession of the accused through the crime / medical evidence. The affirmative, affirmative information of the prosecution and the prosecution of the prosecution had, without a doubt, proved their case without evidence Was granted by the trial court on the basis of Daza. , No intervention required The accused was sentenced to death, confirmed and positively responded to the murder reference in the incident
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012