NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY versus PUT SARAJEVO GENERAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
Section 23 and 28 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 20 (c) Arbitration Act (X-1940), Sections 2 (c), 14 (2), 17, 31, and 39 Making the Court Award Regional Jurisdiction Judicial Award After being declared by a sole arbitrator, the contractor company moved the court to make the award roll of the court; P had granted the request for partial application of the court by making the award roll, The objection to the jurisdiction was raised, as the contract / contract execution I and the head office together with the applicant as well as the defendant company I and L. However, P's court had no territorial jurisdiction over the matter. The respondent's company's request was that the relevant clause agreement set aside space for arbitration purposes only, which had exclusive jurisdiction over the courts. There was no survey from the place where the agreement between the parties was implemented. In the District P&N Agreement, a clause was provided for referring the dispute to the adjuster and then the sole arbitration agreement further stated that arbitration between the parties would be made in I, where there were several courts between which the dispute was settled. Had jurisdiction to hold. Under the agreement, the parties, and the parties agree to send their dispute to any such court or courts, with the consent of the parties, such agreement was not against the provisions of section 23 or 28 of the Contract Act 1872. There is no provision of a contract to grant jurisdiction in any court except in the case of arbitration, even in disputes between the parties to the courts.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
