Find a Lawyer

SAJAD-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 517 Control of the Narcotic Sub Maintenance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C), in this case, the accused had already been convicted and sentenced. Appellant was not an accused in this case and this has happened. That he is a registered owner, no other person has come forward to claim ownership or possession of the vehicle so far as appellant has raised the burden of developing a vehicle before any court law. If so, the appellant (applicant) was given the car to satisfy the trial with two guarantees of Rs. 200,000. On a guarantee

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• MUDASSIR v. State 2012 YLR 463
• NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY v. PUT SARAJEVO GENERAL ENGINEERING COMPANY 2012 CLD 464
• SONA KHAN v. State 2012 MLD 472
• ZAHEERA BIBI v. State 2012 MLD 480
• USMAN ALI v. KHAISTA MUHAMMAD 2012 PCrLJ 493
• AZMAT KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 494
• MAHMOOD KHAN v. Mst. SHAHEEN alias SHAMIM 2012 MLD 495
• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. v. JAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 2012 CLD 502

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

top advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes