NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY versus PUT SARAJEVO GENERAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
Section 2 (c), 14 (2), 17, 31 and 39 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 20 (c) of the Contract Act (Ix of 1872), Sections 23 and 28 of the jurisdiction to make the award roll The option award was announced by the sole arbitrator, the contracting company moved the court to make the court award roll, P granted partial request for the rule by ruling the court award, the appellant The objection to the jurisdiction of the court was raised, as the contract / agreement was executed and the applicant along with the head office as well as the place of the respondent company. And in L, the court of P had no territorial jurisdiction over the matter. The respondent's company's request was that the relevant clause be settled for the purpose of arbitration only in the agreement, which There was no point in giving special jurisdiction to the court where I was working at the place where the agreement was made between the parties. The District P&N Agreement provided a clause for the dispute to be referred to the adjuster, and then the only clear agreement stated that mediation between the parties would take place where there were several courts. There was jurisdiction to maintain the dispute. Under the agreement, the parties, and the parties agree to send their dispute to any court or courts with their mutual consent, such agreement between the parties was not contrary to the provisions of section 23 or 28 of the Treaty of 1872. The jurisdiction to grant jurisdiction to any court shall be in place of the arbitration except where. In certain cases, fur
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
