MALIK BAHADUR SHER KHAN versus HAJI SHAH ALAM KHAN
The specific performance of the contract to sell the final result of the fact by the two courts under Section 12 plaintiff was obtained by the plaintiff in half, in the year 2008, and thereafter an attempt was made to withdraw the contract. He was offered a higher rate by the other party and was simply refusing to respect each other's pretext and the suit and appeal were made trial by making a pretext for a second benefit. The court and the lower appellate court rejected the plaintiff's favor. Evidence of validity and the circumstances of the case indicate that the defendant was contacted before the defendant for a fixed time period, to pay the balance and to confirm the change, but He stopped the matter by excusing his fast, which was dismissed by the property dealer. Was an independent witness and was not specifically denied by the defendant's lawyer in the simultaneous discovery of the facts recorded by the two courts that Ian or any other illegal or material misconduct was viewed as revising the circumstances. I was excluded
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
