Section 517 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Article 48/32/33/74 Articles relating to drug possession, method of confiscation, review of other laws applicable to vehicle. To be taken During the trial used in the commission of the crime, the state was confiscated because the person whose name it was registered in had not yet refused to issue the notice of the alleged owner (appellant). The sentence was that he was legal, real and last, a fine buyer of the pending vehicle. That the other competitor of the vehicle was not a claimant, and prior to the seizure, no notice was issued that the legal claim claimant was never a party to the trial and if he was the original owner of the underlying vehicle Appealed in the trial court for release, because as the owner it was believed that after the arrest of the anti-drug force staff, the owner would know the details of which the proprietary license could not be granted. The authenticity of the document on the vehicle cannot be confirmed on the basis of photocopy / affidavit of the stampede document, in the absence of any concrete, genuine and convincing material, the appeal is dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
