Articles 2 302 (b) and 4 364 A Qatil Ahmed and Definition of Abduction Proof Re App The child, aged in his examination, saw that the accused was riding a bicycle and the accused was seated in front of the accused And the statement of the witness mentioned above was last seen that the prosecution's other witness did not endorse him, the accused was not named in the FIR, but he was named in the supplementary statement, Was recorded eight days after, it was said that the statement against the accused could not be used, because the complainant failed to disclose source information The other person, who did not see the victim in the companion's yard, was recorded after a three-day break, and during that time, the accused remained in police custody and recorded the statement thereafter. The confessional statement was withdrawn It appears that the said confessional statement was not voluntary and did not have the confidence that the blood was damaged - the alleged retrieval in the knife did not prove that the forensic science laboratory reported the crime It was used, which proved that the stolen human was infected with human blood, proving that There was nothing on record to say that human blood was the cause of death, nor was the recovery medical report merely describing the cause of death and there was nothing to link the suspect to the crime. Final evidence was not available allegedly based on final evidence The evidence of self-contradiction of evidence cannot be relied upon by the prosecutor as he is beyond any doubt on the part of the accused.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
