Section 13 Max of Tabs Story was started by the Pre-Importer to gain knowledge of the sale of suits property. And then on the face of it, the performance of Talait Mohivatab appears to be fake and incomprehensible because the case of the pre-emptor living in the same village near the property was not out of the question. For a long time it failed to obtain knowledge of the illicit sale of the property belonging to the village and its purchased property, when the possession of the property was also given to the claimant / seller, who also occupied some of the disputed property after the occupation. This fact was also reflected in the site plan. The change of occupation was always considered to be a notice to all, in the absence of any relevant cause, it was unbelievable to admit that the former king knew of the sale of the adjoining suit property. The property, especially when the possession was also changed, was properly appreciated by the two courts below in which the findings of the concurrence of the facts of the two courts were amended by the Core High Court. Exercise will not be interrupted unless the material on the record is based on false transcript and non-recitation of evidence or there is some judicial error in the results obtained by the courts. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
