Sections 200, 202, 203, 366, 369, 403 and 561 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 13 (a) and 1991 Constitutional Petition seeking to amend a decision seeking a person in the matter of complaint, threatening Maxim: The Nombo Debt-Based Applicants rejected the conditions laid down in their constitutional petition and passed an order passed by the following courts, under which it was summoned in the complaint case, and reviewed. The application was dismissed, before the complainant filed a complaint by the defendant / s not having jurisdiction over the Anti-Terrorism Court. Terminated, summoned to face trial filed against the registration of the complaint by the defendant, the applicant concerned magistrate ordered the Magistrate, Additional Sessions Judge had, rejected the applicant. Article 13 (a) of the Constitution and Section 403, CR PC, and Maxim Development Debit bis vexari pro u filed the Constitution. Despite this (no one should bother twice for the same purpose), he was not attracted to this matter. Because, an order issued under section 203, CCPC, section 366, unacceptable in the CRPC terms, the order disposed of in the second complaint displaced the delivery of section 369, CRPC Which prohibited the amendment of the judgment. To attract the rule to prove himself guilty was that the accused would be prosecuted if he was found guilty. The trial court will have the mandatory jurisdiction. That there must have been a decision or an order to be bad. That the two trials are identical
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
