Find a Lawyer

DR. KHALIL UR REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PUNJAB

Article 199 The Constitutional Applicant was upset at the appointment of respondents to the applicant's question on the application of the results of the warrant, alternatives to the writ writ authority. But because of the low number given by the Special Selection Board, it did not succeed. Therefore, no writ of warrant can usually be issued; Unless there is misconduct, prejudice or error of judgment was floating on record level The High Court refused to interfere with the defendant's appointment.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MAHDI HASSAN alias GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2015 YLR 782
• IBRAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Syed WARIS SHAH 2015 PCrLJ 784
• CRESCENT STAR INSURANCE v. AL-REHMAN TRADERS 2015 CLD 786
• Mehr MUHAMMAD HAYAT v. TAHIR HANIF 2015 YLR 789
• ZAMAN SHAH v. State 2015 MLD 795
• ISHTIAQ MASIH alias BOBI v. State 2015 PCrLJ 797
• FIDA MUHAMMAD v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, Muzaffargarh 2015 CLC 801
• UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, FAISALABAD v. PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE 2015 PLC(CS) 802

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

law firms from Qasba Gujrat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes