Article 85 Suit for the recovery of possession by the vendor under Section Lim Limitation Act (IX of 8 of 1908), Article 6 Q6 Law in this testimony (1984 1984 of 10). It was established that the plaintiff had taken possession of some other plot which was occupied on the 29th of 1991 the plaintiff had filed against the defendants the possession of their plot which was dismissed by the trial court but the appeal. Under the jurisdiction, the lower appellate court ruled in favor of the case. Documentary evidence of the plaintiff's justification, including a delimitation report. Copies of Patwari's record; when the defendant was not affiliated at the time of the demarcation proceedings and the authors of the demarcation proceedings and other documents containing the reports were not presented to the court to prove these documents. Was done, there was no certificate in such documents. The value stated and could not be read in evidence against the defendants The plaintiff was entitled to the property on which the sale was made on that day, therefore, the case was banned which led to the High Court's decision of the High Court. Dismissed and reinstated the trial. A second appeal was allowed in court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
