Section 31 and 32 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and the eighth, the R11 suit were filed after a 120-day fixed-period application for dismissal of the suit. The application was rejected under VI, VI 11, CPC. At the time of the trial, which was accepted and the plaintiff dismissed, the appeal against the trial court's decision was also dismissed, the case endorsed by the appellate court under section 31 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act, 1987 Was set under 120 days. The deadline was not extended to file a case, before the importer was required to enter a period of 120 days and if he fails to file the same in the said period, his There will be no case. Non-issuance of notice by the seller for the purpose of sale does not create any favor for the claimant as no result of the failure of the law was provided. Section 31 of 1987 did not have any tangible or strong effect, providing a time limit for pre-notice, which did not show delay in filing a lawsuit for pre-emption, but rather It was also acknowledged by. The pre-emptor has no alliance with the Revenue Officer in the case of authority and in the case of public notice by the Registrar to the extent of filing a case for sale transaction by verification of mutation decisions in the provisions. Was. The following courts were in accordance with the law and were not subject to any legal weakness or illegality.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
