Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) drug bail possession and smuggling, further investigation approves the borderline case, the High Court has granted the accused bail in similar circumstances. Determining after the recording of the evidence was a question of whether or not the accused was aware of the recovered items lying in the vehicle, where it was forbidden, but the suspects were jailed indefinitely. Could not be held back and even when they had nothing. Three suspects were involved in the previous history of involvement in such cases and it was not yet known the prohibited contact and the extent to which the accused was charged, though, As such, section 497 was entered into a prohibited clause of CR. The PC, but under the law, the possibility of sentencing the accused after the trial in accordance with the recovery of the alleged sanctions, will not fall under the prohibited clause, even if the accused can be punished by attracting a prohibited clause. Given the quantity of the substance recovered, there will be a question that needs further investigation. The allegedly recovered fetal chars were not completely addictive and the chemical examiner did not mention the percent of the drug. , Which made the case of the accused that further investigation is graded clay and the quantity of allegedly recovered from the accused The smuggler / borderline will not make the prohibited business person, who should go in favor of the accused, the accused admitted on bail, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
