REGIONAL MANAGER, MCB BANK LIMITED COMMERCIAL REGION, CIRCULAR ROAD, FAISALABAD versus NAZIR AHMED
Section 2 (i) and Section O12 Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), Complaint application for dismissal of employees of Sections 33 and 47 of the job, employees, a security guard at the bank, for alleged theft Was arrested and jailed in the meantime. After the employee's detention, he was charged and fired. The complaint was accepted by the trial court by the employees and the employers filed an appeal against the Labor Court's misconception that if someone was acquitted of a criminal charge, the department's inquiry would also have an effect. Yes, both treatments were independent of each other and the criminal proceedings would not affect departmental proceedings. Regular punishment of the accused without any formal investigation was not in accordance with the provisions of the Standing. The Order Ordinance, 1968, had been postponed for a while and should be investigated regularly Y certainly thwarted the order passed by the employer / bank, which was a logical case on its face. Because it relinquished misconduct, the law required regular inquiry, in which case the formal investigation was not the legal authority of the supply authority. The bank case was not going to end. In the given situation, if the employee must retire, he or she will be able to complete the pursuit of justice and be able to obtain another service from another institution, the order approved by the Labor Court was amended and The bank's cancellation order was changed to mandatory retirement
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
