DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, POST OFFICE BAHAWALPUR versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE
Compulsory retirement employees charged with misuse of money were forced to retire from forced employment after allegations of misuse of the job when employees complained of permission to file a record against their mandatory retirement order. Employees were retired from the job after thorough scrutiny of the evidence on request. A complaint was filed against the employee set up by the beneficiaries of the Benazir Income Support Program, the affidavit sworn in favor of the employee to apologize for the allegations leveled against him, even by the employer's department. The witness also supported his statement in favor of the employee, who said that action was taken against anyone other than the inquiry employee, and in this inquiry, there were some complaints against the employee, saying the other person Was reinstated by the department against which similar allegations were made, the law does not permit discrimination , The employee was entitled to the same relief. The strictness of mandatory retirement against the employee was a strong evidence that was sufficiently available on record to provide the employee with an exemption from charges. The Department of Council failed to identify any misreading or non-reading or fragmentation of any evidence. Which will support the department. An inquiry report on the inquiry decision in favor of the department against the other person and not against the employee was dismissed by the Department of Labor Court's decision and the Labor Court decision was upheld. ? Letter and spirit be implemented
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
