MANAGING DIRECTOR, WATER AND SANITATION AGENCY, GUJRANWALA versus IRSHAD AHMED
Section 17 Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), Delay in Section 47 (S) Revision Limitation, Disappearance of appeal filed by the applicant under Section 17 of the Wages Act, 1936, after dismissal, application The petitioner reviewed, which was time-barred, and the applicant did not file any petition for condolences. The implication was that the petitioner had to explain the delay of each day. The court would first determine the limit and then no one could be allowed to proceed on the merits. The jurisdiction of the jurisdiction authorized to seek relief beyond the stipulated period was bound to explain the satisfaction of the forum related to each day's delay, because the labor rights of the Labor Court under Section 17 of the Payment were passed to the other party. Were appealed. The Wages Act, 1936, was uniformly banned for more than three months, which ignored the applicant's department's e-government affairs, to waive such a lengthy delay. An impressive or plausible explanation of the distrust was presented by the lawyer \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
