DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT POSTAL SERVICES RAWALPINDI DIVISION, RAWALPINDI versus AHMAD HUSSAIN
The Labor Court had granted permission for the complaint to be filed against employees' dismissal order for delays in filing appeals for dismissal of sections 33 and 47 service, and they were reinstated. In which all three increments were stopped. The Finance Department had filed an appeal against the Labor Court decision, which was stayed for about two months. The Labor Court had failed to satisfactorily clarify the delay after obtaining copies of the Impact decision, which cannot be given any priority to the Government Department. Compared to the other Establishment Courts, the issue of delay was to set boundaries first and then proceed to the virtues. Refer to the provisions of the Limitation Law to refer to. The limitation was to explain the delay of each day for the harassment, influence of the relevant forum, as valuable rights were obtained on the other hand, no lawsuit was filed for defamation delays, appeals were dismissed, r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
