EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (WORKS AND SERVICES) DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, JHANG versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
Section O1 (1) (b) of the Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), Section 33 and 47, requesting a complaint of status of regular service of permanent employees; For the appointments to the years 1993, 2001 and 2006; he continued to serve the department without any break and notoriety and was being paid regular salaries by the employees requesting the department to regularize their services. Was not considered by which he filed a complaint, which was approved by the Labor Court. Was. Served regularly in the department, but letters were issued to ensure that they could not claim permanent status of their employment, but the employees had already been regularized by the department. Was discharged from the same work as employees were performing regular duties and they had been serving for a long time, which was far beyond what was considered under the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968 Temporary Employees The worker could not be called, but since he was working against permanent positions, Became a permanent worker from the service The Labor Court rightly accepted the employee's complaint request, with the direction of the department, to pay all arrears of salaries as regular appellate tribunals to regular employees. However, 50% of the back benefits were allowed and such appeal was dismissed and the Labor Court decision was upheld.
