Section 302 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 164 Qun Qun QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ 10 10 10hadhadatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatabatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat Denied the recording of her confessional statement in her statement under Section 342, CR PC Accused, from the violence that occurred. The contentious stance was admitted as admissible under the law, with the exception of the law, provided that in the present case, the statement was recorded by the Judicial Magistrate in the prescribed form, but not sufficient before relying on it. Understandably, it was to confess that the confession was committed without force or intimidation and was voluntary and, above all, to admit the crime of truth and to withdraw from it, while denying the recording of the crime and its contents. Was synonymous and did not stand as a piece of evidence, as well as the need and the obvious Costs that could be seen was delayed six days recording the confession statement. The matter, and during that time, the fact that the accused was in police custody, raised a question about the voluntary recording of the statement, which the prosecution had to meet, with no explanation as to what happened. Confidence evidence was also needed. For a secure confession of justice administration, the confession allegedly took place at the complainant's home and the victim's report of the incident was filed by the complainant without any delay, especially to the actual accused named accused. Not observed and wa
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
