Section 13 (e) Conduct of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 103 Appreciation of Unlicensed Arms Evidence The arrest of the accused, including his brothers, affected the recovery of the alleged licensed Kalashnikov, including 15 live rounds. ? The matters connected with Section 2302, PPC contradictions, contradictions and lawlessness were found in the evidence of the prosecution, on the basis of which no conviction could be recorded, due to the apparent contradictions in the statements made by the High Court. I was denied the alleged recovery of weapons and ammunition. The prosecution's witnesses did not obtain Kalashnikov's alleged retrieval from the original possession and control of the accused, but were allegedly influenced by a joint home, where the accused resided with his brothers (co-accused in the linked case). Was Section 13 (e) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, means its interpretation in larger areas, and in addition to physical possession, it must also mean the alleged arms and ammunition seized. The word possession and control was a word of wide import and not free from ambiguity. The meaning of possession would depend on the context in which the word was used. In criminal law, the mental element was an essential element of possession. The mandatory provisions of the CRPC were also violated; Kalashnikov's recovery without joining the unlicensed persons despite the availability of Zam, the doubts and suspicions that he can not trust anyone. Similarly, especially when the accused prosecutor was accused of failing to prosecute the prosecution.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
