SYED SHAMSUDDIN versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME AND TRIBAL AFFAIRS
Section 86A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 34, 419 and 420 of the Constitution of the Arts 199 and 247 (7) Removal of applicant's custody from Peshin (Balochistan) to Kohat tribal area at the request of the Assistant Political. The complaint against the brother of the applicant under Agent (APA), Frontier Region, Kohat (KP) section 41919, 420, has been read with Section 3434, PPC and Frontier Crimes Regulation, before the APA. Following the constitutional request by the applicant to recover the debt owed abroad, his release on bail from the APA, challenging his arrest by the Balochistan Government Officers Act without complying with the provisions of section 86A. The CCPC validity nor the complaint alleges that the applicant has taken any money from the complainant. Neither the complaint nor the Commission has constituted a commission. The criminal offense of the applicant was blamed on the complainant abroad and not within the boundaries of Kohat for alleged cause of action against the applicant's brother. Such a complaint cannot be considered in the tribal area and / or tribal area in Pakistan. Thus, the High Court had jurisdiction to decide the matter. The Assistant Political Agent and Commissioner, Kohat Division, arrested and dismissed them. Abused their powers by demand. The petitioner from Pashin to Kohat violated the mandatory supply of Section 86A, CCPC by the Balochistan government respondents for not appearing before the magistrate in Pishin, from where he was abducted and taken to Kohat complainant. And the whole of the state for private purposes
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
