SYED AHMED JAN versus ANJUMAN-E-ISLAMIA, BALOCHISTAN
Sections 4, 13 (6) and 15 evacuation requests are a personal requirement of the land destroyed by the landowner on which the municipality's administration to build a multi-storey building proposed the landlord for the proposed building tenants. Allows In the petition that they had received a controversial open land 40 years ago. He rented and built shops on his own expense and spent a lot of money on installing machinery for his business, while the landlord was ruining his business instead of paying them, while giving the tenants four months. While instructing to evacuate the premises, the landlord was instructed to give shops to the tenants. Not equal to the area of existing shops in the newly constructed building that every tenant has, no tenant denied any ownership of the landlord, such permits and such permits. With the acquisition of the landlord, his needs were fully met. The proposed building, thus, was not approved by the tenant without any further action to stop the pace of development. Extraordinary order did not suffer any illegal action. The number of measles shops in the possession of the tenant was such. I could not find the mention, but he did not dispute that he did not have a shop. A portion of the damaged premises will suffer irreparable damage to tenants and lose residents due to the demolition of existing shops and the demolition of such machinery, so the landlord is a welfare society. Due to which the service of the common people is rent
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
