Sections 2 (c), 2 (d), 3, 4 and 7 ful Legal Occupation \ Scope of Evidence \ Owner \ Evidence scope property was filed in the name of the deceased husband, whether of the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005 Complaint under whether, under such circumstances, the guardian residing in the property as a guardian was bound by the complainant to file an FIR through the Legislature under the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005 On the contrary, the trial court granted its permission under Section 7 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, where the complainant's plea was punished by the accused (s). Which were references by the complainant and the documents on them were fictitious and fabricated. That is, the complainant was neither the occupant nor the recorded owner of the property, and had no legal position to hold the complainant in possession of the property, so that for the purpose of proving legitimate possession, the unlawful injunction A direct complaint may be maintained under the Act 2005. This person had a claim that he or she was claiming such property to provide some documents or evidence to prove the legitimate ownership of the property because the complainant had submitted proprietary documents of the property, while the accused persons Did not provide any evidence or documents to show that they were. Although the legitimate owner or occupant of the property, the complainant was not the recorded owner of the property, which was listed in the name of her deceased husband, but after her death and transfer, her inheritance is owned immediately by the property. The inheritance of the property immediately took place without any interruption
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
